Why would a judge cut down a jury award after the trial is over? That is basically what remittitur means. It happens when a judge decides the amount of money awarded by a jury is too high and not supported by the evidence. Instead of automatically throwing out the whole verdict, the judge may give the injured person a choice: accept a lower amount or face a new trial, usually on damages.

In practical terms, remittitur is a check on verdicts the court sees as excessive. A jury may strongly believe someone was harmed, but the award still has to match the proof of medical bills, lost income, pain, and other losses. If the number goes beyond what the evidence reasonably supports, the defense may ask for remittitur after the verdict. That often comes up through a post-trial motion or a request for a new trial.

For an injury claim, remittitur can change the value of a win after the case seems finished. A plaintiff who expected the full verdict may have to decide whether taking a reduced amount is better than risking another trial. In Massachusetts, judges address these issues under Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 59 (1974), which governs motions for a new trial and related post-verdict relief.